Masters of Rural Development

I am in the process taking a Master in Rural Development at Brandon University, aiming to graduate in Oct./03

Background Context

Most of the long-term activities in my life are, in retrospect, multiply motivated. The MRD is no exception.

Upon entry to the program, I was concerned with three inter-related aspects:

  1. Increasingly, I found myself providing consultant support to clergy on the front lines in a variety of denominations in and around Brandon. I was continually seeking to upgrade and improve the level of excellence in the support that I was able to provide to these leaders, both at a theoretical and practical level: in a one-on-one , group, and media-based contexts.

  2. Specifically, I was interested in The Role of the Rural Church in the current Agricultural Crisis, and was seeking out a guiding paradigm for the local Church to operate effectively in the current context. After becoming aware of an operating paradigm, then I would be able to develop a rule-set which could operationalize such a paradigm in local churches.

  3. At the personal level, I was interested in seeking to find any links between faith and economics, beyond the popular "theologically sugarcoated socialism and capitalism", if indeed such links existed, particularly in this troubled agricultural / local economic development setting. It was my hope that these studies towards a Master of Rural Development would enrich and integrate with the (primarily Biblically-based) economic insights and experiences I had already attained, so as to bring a greater degree of academic rigor to bear on them, moving us all to a greater level of excellence.

Approach Used

In my experience, a Masters Degree is something of a moving target. I recently received some vital perspective in this regard from Ken Bessant. He noted that in Masters Degrees which have no Thesis requirement, it is often replaced with a set of "comprehensive exams". He further noted that at the Doctoral level, passing the comprehensive exam is necessary to become a candidate for a doctorate. Up until that point you are just taking classes. The Doctorate is all about the writing of a Dissertation. At that level they simply say, "take as many courses as you need to pass the qualifying comprehensives". As the Masters is something of a "half-marathon" compared to a Doctorate's "full- marathon", the thesis and comprehensives double up into one activity.

Though that gives me a good perspective for finishing my degree, a quite different outlook has informed my approach to date:

Current Status

Findings To Date

The results have been very rewarding.

Lateral Connections

Required for Completion

For me, the issue is "what remains to be completed so I could complete a set of comprehensive exams in Rural Development successfully?"

The obvious activities are:

Then selection and completion of a Thesis in which I produce some sort of significant output in which all of the above has a chance to be brought, as an integrated whole, to bear on some issue of significance to me.